Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 9 Issue 1 - January 2019


Profile of focal liver lesions by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging

 

Harish K1, Basavaraj N Biradar2*

 

1Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Shridevi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Hospital, NH-4, Bypass road, Tumkur- 572106

2Assistant Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Father Muller Medical college, Father Muller Road, Kankanady, Mangalore, Karnataka- 575002.

Email: hrbs2006@yahoo.co.in  

 

Abstract               Background: Focal liver disease is a common diagnostic problem referred to radiologists for evaluation owing to its nonspecific clinical presentation and marked inter-observer variation on clinical examination. Focal hepatic lesions include a large gamut of both benign and malignant lesions such as hepatic cysts, liver abscesses, haemangioma, adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma, metastases etc. Therefore, the determination of liver lesion count, and the nature of the lesion is important. Thus a study design for evaluation and diagnosis of focal liver lesions by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is conducted. Aims and Objectives: Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, differentiation of benign from malignant liver lesions, differentiation of liver metastasis from primary liver lesions. Methods: Total 60 Patients were studied during period of October 2010 to August 2012. Diagnosis on MRI was made with background of clinical context. Final diagnosis was reached in consensus with biopsy/FNAC, wherever applicable, or clinical, laboratory, other imaging modality findings and follow up. Results: A total of 60 patients with 267 focal liver lesions were studied. Age range was of 16-95 years. Mean age was 52.75 years. Out of 60 patients 31 patients had benign lesions and 29 patients had malignant lesions. 28.33% of patients were in age group of less than 40 years. Most malignant lesions were seen in the age group of 61-70 years. Most of the HCC were seen in the age group of 61-70 years. All lesions were common in males namely HCC (66.67%), metastasis (58.82%), simple cysts (71.42) except haemangiomas and hydatid cysts which were equally seen in males and females. Out of 267 focal liver lesions in 60 patients, 101(37.83%) were benign lesions and 166(62.17%) were malignant lesions. Most common lesion was metastasis (52.8%). Maximum numbers of lesions were between 2.1-5.0cm. Average size of lesion was 3.72 ± 2.39 cm. Conclusion: Diffusion-weighted (DWI) MR imaging can be used for liver lesion detection and characterization, with better results with potential additional value to routine MRI sequences.

Key Word: Diffusion-weighted (DWI) MR imaging, Focal liver lesions, HCC, Metastasis.                  

 

 

INTRODUCTION

Liver diseases have been known to affect mankind since the dawn of civilization and have steadily gained recognition as a major health problem principally because of their world-wide distribution. The symptoms of liver disease such as jaundice, fever, abdominal distension and encephalopathy are striking phenomena that bring the patient to the physician. Clinical and biochemical examination provide information regarding liver size and functions but the assessment of the exact pathology is grossly inadequate. Focal liver disease is a common diagnostic problem referred to radiologists for evaluation owing to its nonspecific clinical presentation and marked inter-observer variation on clinical examination. Focal hepatic lesions include a large gamut of both benign and malignant lesions such as hepatic cysts, liver abscesses, haemangioma, adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatoblastoma, metastases etc. Therefore, the determination of liver lesion count, and the nature of the lesion is important. Today, focal liver lesions are diagnosed using ultrasonography (USG) and/or computed tomography (CT). Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is preferred when further characterization of these masses is needed. With introduction of MRI contrast agents, MRI with contrast material enhancement has potential to become the leading imaging modality in evaluation of liver. MRI is currently considered to be the most accurate noninvasive method in the evaluation of liver lesions.1 Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is another mechanism for developing image contrast and relies on changes in the diffusion properties of water molecules in tissues. DWI is thought to be capable of predicting the response to therapy of malignant tumors.2 Thus a study design for evaluation and diagnosis of focal liver lesions by diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is conducted.

 

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions, differentiation of benign from malignant liver lesions, differentiation of liver metastasis from primary liver lesions.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sample size: Total 60 Patients were studied during period of October 2010 to August 2012. Diagnosis on MRI was made with background of clinical context. Final diagnosis was reached in consensus with biopsy/FNAC, wherever applicable, or clinical, laboratory, other imaging modality findings and follow up.

Inclusion Criteria: All patients referred to the department of Radio diagnosis, Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune. Patients of all age groups referred to MRI clinically suspected of focal liver lesions. Patients with indeterminate lesions detected on USG or CT.

Exclusion Criteria: All patients having cardiac pacemakers, prosthetic heart valves, cochlear implants or any metallic implants. Patient having history of claustrophobia. All patients who do not consent to be a part of the study.

Data Analysis: Patients with more than ten lesions, only larger ten lesions were considered in the study. Results expressed as mean, standard deviation, number and percentages. One-way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparison and student unpaired‘t’ test for 2 group comparison. Categorical data was analyzed by chi-square test. p-value of 0.05 or less was considered for statistically significant.

Machine: 1.5 Tesla GE – SignaHdxt MRI machine. 

OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS

In the present study maximum numbers of patients were in the age group below 40 years of age, followed by patients in the age group of 61 to 70 years, mean age was 52.75 years, male preponderance (65%), when compared to females (35%), Male: Female- 1.85: 1.


 

Table 1: Distribution Of Patients According To Diagnosis

Diagnosis

No. of patients

Percentage

HCC

9

15.0

METS

17

28.3

CholangioCa

1

1.7

CholangioCa + Mets

2

3.3

Haemangioma

8

13.3

Simple hepatic cyst

14

23.3

Abscess + Simple hepatic cyst

1

1.7

Hydatid cyst

2

3.3

Abscess

6

10.0

In the present study, most common lesion studied was metastasis in 17(28.3%) patients, followed by simple hepatic cyst in 15 patients.

Table 2: Distribution Of Patient According To Multiplicity Of Focal Liver Lesions

Number of patients

Percentage

Single lesion

15

25.00

Multiple lesion

45

75.00

Total

60

100.0

In the present study 75% of patients had multiple focal hepatic lesions.

 

Table 3: Distribution Of Lesions According To Liver Lobe Involvement (267)

Number of Focal liver lesions

Percentage

(%)

Hilum

1

0.40

LL

123

46.10

RL

143

53.60

Total

267

100.0

In present study most of patients had involvement of right lobe 53.6%.

 

Table4: Age Wise Distribution Of Cases

Diagnosis

Age group

Total

<40

41-50

51-60

61-70

>70

HCC

0

2

2

5

0

9

METS

6

0

5

6

0

17

CholangioCa

0

0

0

1

0

1

CholangioCa + Mets

0

0

1

0

1

2

Haemangioma

2

1

2

1

2

8

Simple hepatic cyst

5

4

1

2

2

14

Abscess + Simple hepatic cyst

0

0

0

0

1

1

Hydatid cyst

0

2

0

0

0

2

Abscess

4

1

0

1

0

6

Total

17

10

11

16

6

60

Percentage (%)

28.33

16.67

18.33

26.67

10.00

100.00

In the present study out of 60 patients 31 patients had benign lesions and 29 patients had malignant lesions. 28.33% of patients were in age group of less than 40 years, followed by 26.67% in the age group of 61-70 years. Most malignant lesions were seen in the age group of 61-70yrs.

Table 5: Sex Wise Distribution Of Diagnosis Of Focal Liver Lesions

Diagnosis

 

No of cases

Gender

Male

Percentage (%)

Female

Percentage (%)

HCC

9

6

66.67

3

33.33

METS

17

10

58.82

7

41.18

Cholangio Ca

1

0

0.00

1

100

CholangioCa

+ Mets

2

2

100

0

0.00

Haemangioma

8

4

50

4

50

Simple hepatic cyst

14

10

71.42

4

28.58

Abscess + Simple hepatic cyst

1

1

100

0

0.00

Hydatid cyst

2

1

50

1

50

Abscess

6

5

83.33

1

16.67

Total

60

39

100.00

21

100.00

In the present study overall there were 39 males (65%) and 21 females (35%). Male: Female- 1.85: 1. All lesions were common in males namely HCC (66.67%), metastasis (58.82%), simple cysts (71.42) except haemangiomas and hydatid cysts which were equally seen both in males and females.

 

Table 6: Distribution Of Patients According To Benign Or Malignant Lesions

Number of patients

Percentage (%)

Malignant

29

48.3

Benign

31

51.70

Total

60

100.00

In the present study 29 (48.30%) patients had malignant lesions and 31 (51.70%) patients had benign lesions.

 

Table 7: distribution of the total flls according to malignant or benign lesions (267)

Group

No. of lesions

Percentage

Malignant

166

62.17

Benign

101

37.83

Total

267

100.0

Out of 267 focal liver lesions in 60 patients, 101(37.83%) were benign lesions and 166(62.17%) were malignant lesions.

Table 8: Distribution Of Each Flls According To Diagnosis

Diagnosis

No.of lesions

Percentage

HCC

23

8.6

Mets

140

52.43

CholangioCa

3

1.12

Haemangioma

32

12.0

Simple cyst

51

19.1

Hydatid cyst

3

1.1

Abscess

13

4.9

Dysplastic nodule

2

0.7

Total

267

100.0

 

Most common lesion was metastasis(52.8%).

 

Table 9: Distribution Of Lesions According To Size

Size of lesions (cm)

No. of lesions

Percentage (%)

≤ 2

68

25.5

2.1 – 5.0

145

54.3

>5.0

54

20.2

Total

267

100.0

In the present study, maximum 145(53.9%) number of lesions were between 2.1 to 5.0cm. Average size of lesion was 3.72 ± 2.39cm.

 

Table 10: Stratification Of Lesions By Size

Diagnosis

<2cm

2.1-5cm

>5cm

No. of lesions

Percentage

HCC

7

5

11

23

8.6

Mets

39

81

20

140

52.4

Cholangio Ca

0

1

2

3

1.1

Haemangioma

3

23

6

32

12.0

Simple cyst

17

32

2

51

19.1

Hydatid cyst

0

1

2

3

1.1

Abscess

0

2

11

13

4.9

Dysplastic nodule

2

0

0

2

0.7

Total

68

145

54

267

100.0

In the present study most of the HCC and abscesses were more than 5cms. Most of the metastasis haemangiomas, and simple cysts were in the range of 2 to 5cm.

Table 11: Showing sex and age distribution comparison between our study and various similar studies.

 

Demir

et al1

Iman Abbas

Hosny3

Kim et al4

DM Yang

et al5

Our study

Total No Patients

30

38

126

45

60

Age Range (years)

18-88

35-75

19-87

31-75

16-95

Mean age (years)

54.4

48

60

56

52.75

No. of Male Patients

15(50%)

27(71.05%)

86(68.25%

30(66.67%)

39(65%)

No. of Female patients

15(50%)

11(28.95%)

40(31.75%)

15(33.33%)

21(35%)

 

Table 12: Comparison of total number of lesions that includes benign and malignant focal liver lesions and average size with various similar studies and our study

 

Demir et al1

Kim et al4

DM Yang et al5

Xi-Jie Sun et al6

Our study

Total No. lesions

41

92

97

149

267

Benign Lesions.

24

38

46

78

101

Malignant Lesions

17

54

51

71

160

Size Range(cm)

1-17

0.7-10

0.5-5.5

0.8-25.8

0.8-13.5

Average size(cm)

7.4

3.7

1.76

-

3.72

 

 

 


DISCUSSION

A total of 60 patients (267 focal liver lesions) were studied. Diagnosis on MRI was made with background of clinical context. Final diagnoses was reached in consensus with biopsy/ FNAC, wherever applicable, or clinical, laboratory, other imaging modality findings and follow-up. Patients with more than ten lesions, only larger ten lesions were considered in the study. In our study, age range was of 16-95 years. In the present study maximum numbers of patients were in the age group below 40years of age (28.33%), followed by patients in the age group of 61 to 70 years (26.67%).

Mean age of patients in the study was 52.75 years. In the present study overall there were 39 males (65%) and 21 females (35%). Male: Female- 1.85: 1. In present study most malignant lesions were seen in the age group of 61-70 years. Most of the HCC were seen in the age group of 61-70 years. Our study is comparable with most of the above mentioned studies. In the present study 75% of patients had multiple focal hepatic lesions. In present study most of patients had involvement of right lobe 53.6%. In the present study out of 60 patients, 31 patients had benign lesions and 29 patients had malignant lesions. In the present study, most common lesion studied was metastasis in 17(28.3%) patients, followed by simple hepatic cyst in 15 patients. Out of 267 focal liver lesions in 60 patients, 101(37.83%) were benign lesions and 166(62.17%) were malignant lesions.                Our study closely matches with Kim et al4 study with respect size range and average diameter. Most common malignant lesion studied was metastasis in Demiret al1, and Xi-Jie Sun et al6 studies which is comparable with our study. There were total 267 lesions in 60 patients, there were 23 HCCs, 140 metastasis, 3 cholangio carcinoma, 32 haemangiomas, 51 simple cysts, 3 hydatid cyst, 13 abscesses and 2 dysplastic nodules. All lesions were common in males namely HCC (66.67%), metastasis (58.82%), simple cysts (71.42) except haemangiomas and hydatid cysts which were equally seen in males and females. Most common lesion was metastasis(52.8%).

Regarding size distribution of focal liver lesions in our study:    Out of 267 focal liver lesions, 54.3% of lesions (145 lesions) were in the range of 2.1-5.0cm. In the present study most of the HCC and abscesses were more than 5cms. Average size of lesion was 3.72 ± 2.39 cm. Most of the metastasis, haemangiomas, and simple cysts were in the range of 2 to 5cm.

Missed lesions:                Total 11 lesions were missed on DWI including 1 HCC, 3 Mets, 5 Simple cysts, and 2 Dysplastic nodules. This could be due to their location in left lobe or subdiaphragmatic region because of distortion artifacts and most of them were smaller than 1cm. 2 dysplastic nodules were isointense and could not be visualized. These findings are comparable to Kim etal4.

Lesions detection rate stratified by size: The detection rate was stratified according to the lesion size. In lesion less than 2 cm range, DWI detected 57 of 68 (83.82%) lesions. Parikh et al7 study showed that DW MR imaging significantly improved detection of small malignant lesions less than 2 cm (78.5%). Several publications have reported the use of DW MR imaging for liver lesion detection.7,8,9 Few of these studies have compared DW MR imaging and T2-weighted imaging in terms of lesion detection, generally showing improved detection with DW MR imaging,8,10 in terms of image quality, findings showed comparable image quality with that of DW MR imaging by using low b values.11

 

CONCLUSION

Diffusion-weighted (DW) MR imaging can be used for liver lesion detection and characterization, with better results with potential additional value to routine MRI sequences.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Demir OI, Obuz F, Sağol O, Dicle O. Contribution of diffusion-weighted MRI to the differential diagnosis of hepatic masses. DiagnInterv Radiol.2007; 13:81-86.
  2. Kele P, Van der Jagt, E.World J Gastroenterol. 2010 April 7; 16(13): 1567–1576.
  3. Abbas I, Elghawabi H. Diffusion mri of focal liver lesions.PJR, 2010Jan-Mar; 1(20):01-07.
  4. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Hori M, Tsuda K, Nakamura H. Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 393–398.
  5. Yang DM, Jahng GH, Kim HC, et al. The detection and discrimination of malignant and benign focal hepatic lesions: T2 weighted vs diffusion-weighted MRI. Br J Radiol. 2011; 84: 319–326.
  6. Sun XJ, Quan XY, et al. Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of focal hepatic lesions. World J Gastroenterol2005; 11: 6535–6537.
  7. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008; 246: 812– 822.
  8. Bruegel M, Gaa J, Waldt S, Woertler K, Holzapfel K, Kiefer B, Rummeny EJ. Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Nov; 191(5):1421-9.
  9. Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S, et al. Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging. Radiology 2006; 239:122–130.
  10. Okada Y, Ohtomo K, Kiryu S, Sasaki Y. Breath-hold T2-weighted MRI of hepatic tumors: value of echo planar imaging with diffusion-sensitizing gradient. J Comput Assist Tomogr1998; 22: 364–371.
  11. Hussain SM, De Becker J, Hop WC, Dwarkasing S, Wielopolski PA. Can a single shot black-blood T2-weighted spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with sensitivity encoding replace the respiratory triggered turbo spin-echo sequence for the liver? An optimization and feasibility study. J MagnReson Imaging 2005; 21: 219–229